AI Image Generation

Midjourney

by Midjourney Inc. midjourney.com ↗

Unmatched aesthetic quality, unique artistic style

Reviewed by ToolIntel · Feb 20, 2026 · Methodology v1.0
🔄 Refresh scheduled: Aug 2026
✓ Verified: We paid for and tested this product

81 out of 100
⇄ Compare

Score Breakdown by Category

Core AI Performance (25%)
92
Data Privacy & Security (20%)
68
Transparency (15%)
58
Reliability & Uptime (10%)
88
Compliance (10%)
65
Pricing Fairness (8%)
85
Integration & Usability (5%)
75
Human Override (4%)
82
Vendor Accountability (2%)
55
Bias & Fairness (1%)
70

The Verdict

✓ Ideal For

  • Artists and designers seeking aesthetic inspiration
  • Marketing teams needing stylized visuals
  • Concept artists and illustrators
  • Users who prioritize visual quality over control
  • Creative exploration and ideation

✗ Not Ideal For

  • Photorealistic product imagery
  • Precise control over composition
  • Enterprise compliance requirements
  • Users uncomfortable with Discord-first UX
  • Those needing clear IP/licensing

💪 Top Strengths

  • Aesthetic quality: Consistently produces beautiful, stylized images
  • Style versatility: Excellent at artistic styles, illustration, concept art
  • Character consistency: "cref" for consistent characters across images
  • Community: Active Discord with inspiration and learning

⚠️ Top Weaknesses

  • Low transparency: Opaque about model training and data sources
  • Discord UX: Primary interface is Discord (web app exists but limited)
  • IP concerns: Trained on artist work without consent (lawsuits pending)
  • No API: Limited automation and integration options
💡 What the marketing page doesn't tell you

Midjourney faces ongoing lawsuits from artists over training data. The company has been opaque about what data was used to train its models. While the output quality is excellent, enterprises should consider the legal and ethical risks. Additionally, the Discord-first approach means all your prompts and images are public by default (private mode requires higher tiers).

Deep Dive Analysis

Core AI Performance — 92/100

Midjourney V6 sets the standard for aesthetic image generation:

  • Aesthetic quality: 95% of images are immediately usable or need minor edits
  • Style interpretation: Excellent at understanding artistic directions
  • Text rendering: Improved but still inconsistent
  • Prompt adherence: Good for style, weaker for precise composition
  • Character references: "cref" feature is industry-leading for consistency

For pure visual quality and artistic output, Midjourney remains the benchmark.

Transparency — 58/100

This is Midjourney's weakest area:

No disclosure of training data sources
Pending lawsuits from artists over training data
CEO has made controversial statements about artist data
Limited documentation on model capabilities/limitations
Content policy exists and is enforced

Pricing Analysis

TierPriceWhat You GetHidden Costs?
Basic$10/mo~200 images/mo, community galleryImages are public
Standard$30/mo~900 images/mo, unlimited relaxedRelaxed mode is slow
Pro$60/mo~1800 images/mo, stealth modeNone identified
Mega$120/mo~3600 images/mo, max fast hoursFor power users only

Value Assessment: Standard at $30/mo is the sweet spot for most users. The Basic tier's ~200 images/mo runs out fast if you're iterating. Pro's stealth mode is worth it for commercial work.

How We Tested

  • Duration: 30 days (Jan-Feb 2026)
  • Plans tested: Basic ($10), Standard ($30), Pro ($60)
  • Prompts: 200+ across portraits, landscapes, products, abstract
  • Comparison: Same prompts in DALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, Firefly

Alternatives to Consider

DALL-E 3
78
Better text, clearer licensing
Adobe Firefly
76
Safe IP, Adobe integration
Stable Diffusion
74
Open source, full control

Community Signal SEPARATE FROM EDITORIAL

Community ratings launching soon. Get notified →

Review Change Log

Feb 20, 2026Initial review published. Score: 81/100